The 3Rs in animal welfare bodies at Swedish universities – knowledge, attitudes, implementation

Main Article Content

Johan Lindsjö
Charlotte Berg
Ulf Olsson
Elin Törnqvist

Abstract

The implementation of the 3Rs (replacement, reduction and refinement) is emphasized in EU Directive 2010/63. The task of the animal welfare bodies (AWB) is to strengthen animal welfare and develop the 3Rs at research animal facilities. In 2016, we surveyed the knowledge on, attitudes towards and implementation of the 3Rs within AWBs at eight major Swedish universities. Based on responses of 34 closed-ended questions from 44 of 90 AWB members, the overall attitude towards the 3Rs was positive. AWB members did not believe that the 3Rs slow down innovation or result in increased costs, and refinement was considered beneficial for research quality. AWB members were particularly positive towards refinement questions in the survey. A majority of the AWB members predicted that alternative methods will never replace animal use. Researchers as a group represented in the AWBs were significantly less positive towards the 3Rs compared to the group of veterinarians. The tasks of the AWBs, e.g., giving advice on the 3Rs and following up on animal use in projects, were often not carried out in the AWB or not known by the respondents. Our results indicate a need for more practical and regulatory guidance and support to the AWBs. To reach the goal of the EU Directive to phase out animal use in research and education, we suggest that technical expertise in replacement techniques is included in the AWBs. We emphasize the need to strengthen the awareness of the 3Rs among researchers at Swedish universities.

Article Details

How to Cite
Lindsjö, J., Berg, C., Olsson, U. and Törnqvist, E. (2021) “The 3Rs in animal welfare bodies at Swedish universities – knowledge, attitudes, implementation”, ALTEX - Alternatives to animal experimentation, 38(3), pp. 477-489. doi: 10.14573/altex.1911141.
Section
Articles
References

Baldelli, I., Massaro, A., Penco, S. et al. (2017). Conscientious objection to animal experimentation in Italian Universities. Animals (Basel) 7, 24. doi:10.3390/ani7030024

Brønstad, A. and Berg, A. G. (2011). The role of organizational culture in compliance with the principles of the 3Rs. Lab Anim (NY) 40, 22-26. doi:10.1038/laban0111-22

Curzer, H. J., Wallace, M. C., Perry, G. et al. (2013). The ethics of wildlife research: A nine R theory. ILAR J 54, 52-57. doi:10.1093/ilar/ilt012

Curzer, H. J., Perry, G., Wallace, M. C. et al. (2016). The three Rs of animal research: What they mean for the institutional animal care and use committee and why. Sci Eng Ethics 22, 549-565. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9659-8

Ditlevsen, K., Lund, T. B. and Lassen, J. (2018). Replacement i forsøgsdyrsforskningen? En kvalitativ analyse af muligheder og barrierer. Frederiksberg: Institut for Fødevare- og Ressourceøkonomi, Københavns Universitet. IFRO Rapport, Nr. 270.

EU – European Union (2008). Council Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). OJ L 142, 1-739.

EU (2010). Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. OJ L 276, 33-79.

EU (2014). Caring for animals aiming for better science. National Competent Authorities for the implementation of Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes – A working document on Animal Welfare Bodies and National Committees to fulfil the requirements under the Directive. Brussels, 9-10 October 2014.

EU (2017). Commission staff working document Accompanying the document Report from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European economic and social committee and the Committee of the regions In accordance with Article 58 of Directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. COM/2017/0631 final.

Executive Committee of the Congress (2009). The three Rs declaration of Bologna, adopted by the third world congress on alternative and animal use in the life sciences, Bologna, Italy, on 31 August 1999. Altern Lab Anim 37, 286-289. doi:10.1177/026119290903700310

Fenwick, N., Danielson, P. and Griffin, G. (2011). Survey of Canadian animal-based researchers’ views on the three Rs: Replacement, reduction and refinement. PLoS One 6, 22478. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022478

Franco, N. H. and Olsson, I. A. (2014). Scientists and the 3Rs: Attitudes to animal use in biomedical research and the effect of mandatory training in laboratory animal science. Lab Anim 48, 50-60. doi:10.1177/0023677213498717

Franco, N. H., Sandøe, P. and Olsson, I. A. S. (2018). Researchers’ attitudes to the 3Rs – An upturned hierarchy? PLoS One 13, e0200895. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200895

Graham, M. L. and Prescott, M. J. (2015). The multifactorial role of the 3Rs in shifting the harm-benefit analysis in animal models of disease. Eur J Pharmacol 759, 19-29. doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.03.040

Hartung, T. (2010). Comparative analysis of the revised Directive 2010/63/EU for the protection of laboratory animals with its predecessor 86/609/EEC – A t4 report. ALTEX 27, 285-303. doi:10.14573/altex.2010.4.285

Houde, L., Dumas, C. and Leroux, T. (2009). Ethics: Views from IACUC members. Altern Lab Anim 37, 291-296. doi:10.1177/026119290903700311

Hubrecht, R. (2014). The Welfare of Animals Used in Research: Practice and Ethics. Ames, Iowa, USA: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Hunt, M. J. and Macaskill, M. C. (2017). Student responses to active learning activities with live and virtual rats in psychology teaching laboratories. Teach Psychol 44, 160-164. doi:10.1177/0098628317692632

Knight, S., Vrij, A., Bard, K. et al. (2009). Science versus human welfare? Understanding attitudes toward animal use. J Soc Issues 65, 463-483. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01609.x

Lane, J. M. and McDonald, R. A. (2010). Welfare and ‘best practice’ in field studies of wildlife. In R. Hubrecht and J. Kirkwood (eds.), The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory and Other Research Animals (92-106). 8th edition. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781444318777

Leaman, J., Latter, J. and Clemence, M. (2014). Attitudes to animal research in 2014. A report by Ipsos MORI for the Department for Business, Innovation & Skills. 14-012982-01. https://bit.ly/32I2utw

Leenaars, M., Savenije, B., Nagtegaal, A. et al. (2009). Assessing the search for and implementation of the three Rs: A survey among scientists. Altern Lab Anim 37, 297-303. doi:10.1177/026119290903700312

Lindsjö, J., Fahlman, Å. and Törnqvist, E. (2016). Animal welfare from mouse to moose – Implementing the principles of the 3Rs in wildlife research. Jour Wildl Dis 52, S65-S77. doi:10.7589/52.2S.S65

Ljung, P. E. and Bornestaf, C. (2018). Användning av försöksdjur i Sverige under 2016. Jordbruksverket Rapport Dnr: 5.2.17-12670/17 (in Swedish).

Morrison, D. F. (1976). Multivariate Statistical Methods. 2nd edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

NC3Rs – National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (2008). Views on the 3Rs, Survey Report – 2008. London, UK.

NORECOPA – Norwegian Consensus Platform for Replacement Reduction and Refinement of Animal Experiments (2012). Harmonisation of the Care and Use of Agricultural Animals in Research. Gardermoen, 26-28 September 2012. A consensus document from the participants. https://norecopa.no/media/6323/consensus-statement-agricultural-animals.pdf

Nøhr, R., Lund, T. B. and Lassen, J. (2016). The Danish 3R survey: Knowledge, attitudes and experiences with the 3Rs among researchers involved in animal experiments in Denmark. Fredriksberg: Department of Food and ResourceEconomics, University of Copenhagen. IFRO Report, No. 249.

Olsson, U. (1979). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika 44, 443-460. doi:10.1007/BF02296207

Olsson, U. (2002). Generalized Linear Models: An Applied Approach. Lund, Sweden: Student-litteratur.

Purchase, I. F. H. and Nedeva, M. (2002). The impact of the introduction of the ethical review process for research using animals in the UK: Implementation of policy. Lab Anim 36, 68-85. doi:10.1258/0023677021911786

Russell, W. M. S. and Burch, R. L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. London, UK: Methuen & Co. Ltd.

SAS Institute Inc. (2017). SAS/Stat User’s Guide. Version 9.4. Cary, N.C., SAS Institute Inc.

Schiffelers, M. J., Blaauboer, B. J., Fentener van Vlissingen, J. M. et al. (2007). Factors stimulating or obstructing the implementation of the 3Rs in the regulatory process. ALTEX 24, 271-833. doi:10.14573/altex.2007.4.271

Schuppli, C. A. and Fraser, D. (2005). The interpretation and application of the three Rs by animal ethics committee members. Altern Lab Anim 33, 487-500. doi:10.1177/026119290503300511

Silva, R. M. G., Matera, J. M. and Ribeiro, A. A. C. M. (2007). New alternative methods to teach surgical techniques for veterinary medicine students despite the absence of living animals. Is that an academic paradox? Anat Histol Embryol 36, 220-224. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0264.2007.00759.x

Swedish Board of Agriculture (2019). Swedish Regulations and General Recommendations (SJVFS 2019:9) on Research Animals, case no L150. https://lagen.nu/sjvfs/2019:9

Törnqvist, E., Annas, A., Granath, B. et al. (2014). Strategic focus on 3R principles reveals major reductions in the use of animals in pharmaceutical toxicity testing. PLoS One 9, e101638. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101638

van Luijk, J., Cuijpers, Y., van der Vaart, L. et al. (2011). Assessing the search for information on three Rs methods, and their subsequent implementation: A national survey among scientists in the Netherlands. Altern Lab Anim 39, 429-447. doi:10.1177/026119291103900505

van Luijk, J., Cuijpers, Y., van der Vaart, L. et al. (2013). Assessing the application of the 3Rs: A survey among animal welfare officers in the Netherlands. Lab Anim 47, 210-219. doi:10.1177/0023677213483724

Whittaker, A. L. and Anderson, G. I. (2013). A policy at the University of Adelaide for student objections to the use of animals in teaching. J Vet Med Edu 40, 52-57. doi:10.3138/jvme.0411.045R1

Most read articles by the same author(s)