Dog as the experimental model: Laboratory uses of dogs in the United States

Main Article Content

Sherry L. Ward
Pamela Osenkowski

Abstract

Dogs are the experimental model in many types of biomedical research. Each year, hundreds of publications report the use of dogs in invasive biomedical procedures, often without sufficient explanation of the purpose and justification for selecting dog as the experimental model. The European Union requires detailed reporting of animal use that includes research purpose, but animal use reporting in the United States, overseen by the USDA, does not require this information. The ability to replace dogs with alternative models begins by understanding how they are used. Therefore, this study was undertaken to investigate the types of invasive biomedical procedures that dogs are subjected to in US laboratories. Well-defined sets of research publications and grants were accessed to obtain information on the types of biomedical research using dogs. USDA databases provided additional information. An ontology to categorize biomedical research uses of dogs identified the most common as translational studies for cardiovascular, cancer, nervous/mental, and musculoskeletal disorders. Information typically reported for experimental animals was sometimes missing or incomplete in publications, including number, source, and fate of dogs; species justification; and pain management, suggesting that many journals have not adopted the ARRIVE guidelines on animal use reporting. It was not possible to identify the research purpose for all dogs used by US institutions because a) not all dog use is published and b) animal research purpose is not required reporting in the US. These findings should be informative to future initiatives to replace, reduce, and refine the use of dogs in research.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ward, S. L. and Osenkowski, P. (2022) “Dog as the experimental model: Laboratory uses of dogs in the United States”, ALTEX - Alternatives to animal experimentation. doi: 10.14573/altex.2109101.
Section
Articles
References

Barthelemy, I., Hitte, C. and Tiret, L. (2019). The dog model in the spotlight: Legacy of a trustful cooperation. Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases 6(4), 421-451. doi:10.3233/JND-190394

Bertrand, H., Sandersen, C. and Flecknell, P. A. (2018). Reported analgesic and anaesthetic administration to non-human primates undergoing experimental surgical procedure: 2010-2015. Journal of Medical Primatology, 10.1111/jmp.12346. doi:10.1111/jmp.12346

Box, R. J. and Spielmann, H. (2005). Use of the dog as non-rodent test species in the safety testing schedule associated with the registration of crop and plant protection products (pesticides): present status. Archives of Toxicology 79(11), 615–626. doi:10.1007/s00204-005-0678-0

Carbone L. (2012). Pain management standards in the eighth edition of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science 51(3), 322–328.

Carbone, L. and Austin, J. (2016). Pain and laboratory animals: Publication practices for better data reproducibility and better animal welfare. PloS One 11(5), e0155001. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0155001

Cashman, T. J., Josowitz, R., Johnson, B. V. et al. (2016). Human engineered cardiac tissues created using induced pluripotent stem cells reveal functional characteristics of BRAF-mediated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. PloS One 11(1), e0146697. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146697

Coulter, C. A., Flecknell, P. A. and Richardson, C. A. (2009). Reported analgesic administration to rabbits, pigs, sheep, dogs and non-human primates undergoing experimental surgical procedures. Laboratory Animals, 43(3), 232–238. doi:10.1258/la.2008.008021

EC – European Commission (2012). Commission Implementing Decision of 14 November 2012 Establishing a Common Format for the Submission of the Information Pursuant to Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02012D0707-20140115

EC (2020a). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. 2019 Report on the Statistics on the Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes in the Member States of the European Union in 2015-2017, COM/2020/16 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0016&qid=1625787931541

EC (2020b). Commission Staff Working Document - 2019 Report on the Statistics on the Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes in the Member States of the European Union in 2015-2017. SWD(2020) 10 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1581689520921&uri=CELEX:52020SC0010

Fenwick, N., Duffus, S. E. and Griffin, G. (2014). Pain management for animals used in science: Views of scientists and veterinarians in Canada. Animals 4(3), 494–514. doi:10.3390/ani4030494

Fleischer, S., Sharkey, M., Mealey, K. et al. (2008). Pharmacogenetic and metabolic differences between dog breeds: Their impact on canine medicine and the use of the dog as a preclinical animal model. The AAPS Journal 10(1), 110–119. doi:10.1208/s12248-008-9011-1

Funakoshi, S. and Yoshida, Y. (2021). Recent progress of iPSC technology in cardiac diseases. Archives of Toxicology 95, 3633–3650. doi:10.1007/s00204-021-03172-3

Gähwiler, E., Motta, S. E., Martin, M. et al. (2021). Human iPSCs and genome editing technologies for precision cardiovascular tissue engineering. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 9, 639699. doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.639699

Guittin, P. and Decelle, T. (2002). Future improvements and implementation of animal care practices within the animal testing regulatory environment. ILAR Journal 43(Suppl. 1), S80–S84, doi:10.1093/ilar.43.Suppl_1.S80

Hanton, G. and Rabemampianina, Y. (2006). The electrocardiogram of the Beagle dog: Reference values and effect of sex, genetic strain, body position and heart rate. Laboratory Animals 40(2), 123–136. doi:10.1258/002367706776319088

Harper, E. J., Hackett, R. M., Wilkinson, J. and Heaton, P. R. (2003). Age-related variations in hematologic and plasma biochemical test results in Beagles and Labrador Retrievers. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 223(10), 1436–1442. doi:10.2460/javma.2003.223.1436

Hasiwa, N., Bailey, J., Clausing, P. et al. (2011). t4 workshop report: Critical evaluation of the use of dogs in biomedical research and testing in Europe. ALTEX 28(4), 326-340. doi:10.14573/altex.2011.4.326

Herrmann, K. and Flecknell, P. (2019). Retrospective review of anesthetic and analgesic regimens used in animal research proposals. ALTEX 36(1), 65–80. doi:10.14573/altex.1804011

Ikeda-Douglas, C. J., de Rivera, C. and Milgram, N. W. (2005). Pharmaceutical and other commercial uses of the dog model. Progress in Neuro-psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry 29(3), 355–360. doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2004.12.001

Ishikawa, K. (ed.) (2018), Experimental Models of Cardiovascular Diseases. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 1816. New York: Humana Press. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8597-5

Kringe, L., Sena, E. S., Motschall, E. et al. (2020). Quality and validity of large animal experiments in stroke: A systematic review. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 40(11), 2152–2164. doi:10.1177/0271678X20931062

Lee, J. G., Sung, Y. H. and Baek, I. J. (2018). Generation of genetically-engineered animals using engineered endonucleases. Archives of Pharmacal Research 41(9), 885–897. doi:10.1007/s12272-018-1037-z

Li, R. A., Keung, W., Cashman, T. J. et al. (2018). Bioengineering an electro-mechanically functional miniature ventricular heart chamber from human pluripotent stem cells. Biomaterials 163, 116–127. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.02.024

Maddah, M., Mandegar, M. A., Dame, K. et al. (2020). Quantifying drug-induced structural toxicity in hepatocytes and cardiomyocytes derived from hiPSCs using a deep learning method. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods 105, 106895. doi:10.1016/j.vascn.2020.106895

Milan, D. J. and MacRae, C. A. (2005). Animal models for arrhythmias. Cardiovascular Research 67(3), 426–437. doi:10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.06.012

NASEM – National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) (2020). Necessity, Use, and Care of Laboratory Dogs at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. doi:10.17226/25772

NIH OLAW – Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare (2015). Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. NIH Publication No. 15-8013.

National Research Council (NRC) (1994). Laboratory Animal Management: Dogs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/2120

NRC. (2009a). Scientific and Humane Issues in the Use of Random Source Dogs and Cats in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/12641

NRC. (2009b). Recognition and Alleviation of Pain in Laboratory Animals. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/12526

NRC. (2011). Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (8th ed.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. http://doi.org/10.17226/12910

Oh, J. G. and Ishikawa, K. (2018). Experimental models of cardiovascular diseases: Overview. In K. Ishikawa (ed.), Experimental Models of Cardiovascular Diseases. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 1816 (3–14). New York: Humana Press. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8597-5_1

Percie du Sert, N., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S. et al. (2020a). Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0. PLoS Biology 18(7), e3000411. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411

Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S. et al. (2020b). The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biology 18(7), e3000410. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410

Powers, J. C. and Recchia, F. (2018). Canine model of pacing-induced heart failure. Methods in Molecular Biology 1816, 309–325. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8597-5_24

Ribeiro, A., Guth, B. D., Engwall, M. et al. (2019). Considerations for an in vitro, cell-based testing platform for detection of drug-induced inotropic effects in early drug development. Part 2: Designing and fabricating microsystems for assaying cardiac contractility with physiological relevance using human iPSC-cardiomyocytes. Frontiers in Pharmacology 10, 934. doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.00934

Savoji, H., Mohammadi, M. H., Rafatian, N. et al. (2019). Cardiovascular disease models: A game changing paradigm in drug discovery and screening. Biomaterials 198, 3–26. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.036

Shen, Y-T., Chen, L., Testani, J.M. et al. (2017). Animal models for cardiovascular research. In P.M. Conn (ed.), Animal Models for the Study of Human Disease (2nd ed.) (147-174). London: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-809468-6.00006-1

Simon, L. R. and Masters, K. S. (2020). Disease-inspired tissue engineering: Investigation of cardiovascular pathologies. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering 6(5), 2518–2532. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01067

Switonski M. (2020). Impact of gene therapy for canine monogenic diseases on the progress of preclinical studies. Journal of Applied Genetics 61(2), 179–186. doi:10.1007/s13353-020-00554-8

Turnbull, I. C., Karakikes, I., Serrao, G. W. et al. (2014). Advancing functional engineered cardiac tissues toward a preclinical model of human myocardium. FASEB Journal 28(2), 644–654. doi:10.1096/fj.13-228007

Turnbull, I. C., Mayourian, J., Murphy, J. F. et al. (2018). Cardiac tissue engineering models of inherited and acquired cardiomyopathies. In K. Ishikawa (ed.), Experimental Models of Cardiovascular Diseases. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 1816 (145-159). New York: Humana Press. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8597-5_11

Uhlig, C., Krause, H., Koch, T. et al. (2015). Anesthesia and monitoring in small laboratory mammals used in anesthesiology, respiratory and critical care research: A systematic review on the current reporting in top-10 impact factor ranked journals. PloS One 10(8), e0134205. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0134205

van der Naald, M., Wenker, S., Doevendans, P.A. et al. (2020). Publication rate in preclinical research: A plea for preregistration. BMJ Open Science 4(1), e100051. doi:10.1136/bmjos-2019-100051

Wilson, S., Nagel, S. J., Frizon, L. A. et al. (2020). The hemisection approach in large animal models of spinal cord injury: Overview of methods and applications. Journal of Investigative Surgery 33(3), 240–251. doi:10.1080/08941939.2018.1492048

Yoo, S., Aistrup, G., Shiferaw, Y. et al. (2018). Oxidative stress creates a unique, CaMKII-mediated substrate for atrial fibrillation in heart failure. JCI Insight 3(21), e120728. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.120728