Predictive alternative methods for assessing biocompatibility of dental materials: A NIST-NIDCR workshop report

Elijah J. Petersen; John T. Elliott; Simona Bancos; Brittany Caldwell; Sharukh S. Khajotia; Nicole C. Kleinstreuer; Edward Margerrison; Carmem  Pfeifer

doi:10.14573/altex.2206241

pdf

Published: Jul 20, 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.2206241

Keywords:

biocompatibility, dental materials, oral, teeth, new approach methodologies (NAMs)

Elijah J. Petersen , John T. Elliott, Simona Bancos, Brittany Caldwell, Sharukh S. Khajotia, Nicole C. Kleinstreuer, Edward Margerrison, Carmem Pfeifer
[show affiliations]

Elijah J. Petersen

Biosystems and Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD, United States

John T. Elliott

Biosystems and Biomaterials Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD, United States

Simona Bancos

Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States

Brittany Caldwell

Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States

Sharukh S. Khajotia

Department of Restorative Sciences, Division of Dental Biomaterials, College of Dentistry, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, United States

Nicole C. Kleinstreuer

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States

Edward Margerrison

Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States

Carmem Pfeifer

Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA

[hide affiliations]

How to Cite

Petersen, E. J. (2022) “Predictive alternative methods for assessing biocompatibility of dental materials: A NIST-NIDCR workshop report ”, ALTEX - Alternatives to animal experimentation, 39(3), pp. 522–524. doi: 10.14573/altex.2206241.

Issue

Vol. 39 No. 3 (2022)

Section

Meeting Reports

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is appropriately cited (CC-BY). Copyright on any article in ALTEX is retained by the author(s).

References

Ankley, G. T., Bennett, R. S., Erickson, R. J. et al. (2010). Adverse outcome pathways: A conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 29, 730-741. doi:10.1002/etc.34

Christ, A., Kainz, W., Hahn, E. G. et al. (2010). The Virtual family – Development of surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations. Phys Med Biol 55, N23-38. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/55/2/n01

Clippinger, A. J., Raabe, H. A., Allen, D. G. et al. (2021). Human-relevant approaches to assess eye corrosion/irritation potential of agrochemical formulations. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 40, 145-167. doi:10.1080/15569527.2021.1910291

De Jong, W. H., Carraway, J. W., Liu, C. et al. (2020). The suitability of reconstructed human epidermis models for medical device irritation assessment: A comparison of in vitro and in vivo testing results. Toxicol In Vitro 69, 104995. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2020.104995

Elliott, J. T., Rosslein, M., Song, N. W. et al. (2017). Toward achieving harmonization in a nanocytotoxicity assay measurement through an interlaboratory comparison study. ALTEX 34, 201-218. doi:10.14573/altex.1605021

Gosselin, M. C., Neufeld, E., Moser, H. et al. (2014). Development of a new generation of high-resolution anatomical models for medical device evaluation: The virtual population 3.0. Phys Med Biol 59, 5287-5303. doi:10.1088/0031-9155/59/18/5287

Hariri, A., Palma-Chavez, J., Wear, K. A. et al. (2021). Polyacrylamide hydrogel phantoms for performance evaluation of multispectral photoacoustic imaging systems. Photoacoustics 22, 100245. doi:10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100245

Iacono, M. I., Neufeld, E., Akinnagbe, E. et al. (2015). MIDA: A multimodal imaging-based detailed anatomical model of the human head and neck. PLoS One 10, e0124126. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124126

ISO (2021a). ISO 10993-12:2021 Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 12: Sample preparation and reference materials.

ISO (2021b). ISO 10993-23:2021 Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 23: Tests for irritation.

OECD (2021). Guideline No. 497: Defined Approaches on Skin Sensitisation. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. OECD Publishing, Paris. doi:10.1787/b92879a4-en.

Padovani, G. C., Feitosa, V. P., Sauro, S. et al. (2015). Advances in dental materials through nanotechnology: Facts, perspectives and toxicological aspects. Trends Biotechnol 33, 621-636. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.09.005

Petersen, E. J., Uhl, R., Toman, B. et al. (2022a). Development of a 96-well electrophilic allergen screening assay for skin sensitization using a measurement science approach. Toxics 10, 257. doi:10.3390/toxics10050257

Petersen, E. J., Elliott, J. T., Gordon, J. et al. (2022b). Technical framework for enabling high quality measurements in new approach methodologies (NAMs). ALTEX, online ahead of print. doi:10.14573/altex.2205081

Rösslein, M., Elliott, J. T., Salit, M. et al. (2015). Use of cause-and-effect analysis to design a high-quality nanocytotoxicology assay. Chem Res Toxicol 28, 21-30. doi:10.1021/tx500327y

Saylor, D. M., Chandrasekar, V., Simon, D. D. et al. (2019). Strategies for rapid risk assessment of color additives used in medical devices. Toxicol Sci 172, 201-212. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfz179

Sun, J., Petersen, E. J., Watson, S. S. et al. (2017). Biophysical characterization of functionalized titania nanoparticles and their application in dental adhesives. Acta Biomaterialia 53, 585-597. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.084

Article Sidebar

Main Article Content

Article Details

Most read articles by the same author(s)