4.2 million and counting… The animal toll for REACH systemic toxicity studies

Main Article Content

Jean Knight, Thomas Hartung, Costanza Rovida
[show affiliations]

Abstract

The EU’s chemicals regulation, REACH, requires that most chemicals in the EU be evaluated for human health and ecosystem risks, with a mandate to minimize use of animal tests for these evaluations. The REACH process has been ongoing since about 2008, but a calculation of the resulting animal use is not publicly available. For this reason, we have undertaken a count of animals used for REACH. With EU legislators set to consider REACH revisions that could expand animal testing, we are releasing results for test categories counted to date: reproductive toxicity tests, developmental toxicity tests, and repeat­ed-dose toxicity tests for human health. The total animal count as of December 2022 for these categories is about 2.9 million. Additional tests involving about 1.3 million animals are currently required by a final proposal authorization or compliance check but not yet completed. The total, 4.2 million, for just these three test categories exceeds the original European Com­mission forecast of 2.6 million for all REACH tests. The difference is primarily because the European Commission estimate excluded offspring, which are most of the animals used for REACH. Other reasons for the difference are extra animals included in tests to ensure sufficient survive to meet the minimum test requirement; dose range-finding tests; extra test animal groups, e.g., for recovery analysis; and a high rejection rate of read-across studies. Given higher than forecast animal use, the upcoming debate on proposed REACH revisions is an opportunity to refocus on reducing animal numbers in keeping with the REACH mandate.

Article Details

How to Cite
Knight, J., Hartung, T. and Rovida, C. (2023) “4.2 million and counting… The animal toll for REACH systemic toxicity studies”, ALTEX - Alternatives to animal experimentation, 40(3), pp. 389–407. doi: 10.14573/altex.2303201.
Section
Articles
References

EC – European Commission (2001). White Paper – Strategy for a future Chemicals Policy. COM(2001) 88 final.

ECHA (2013). Evaluation under REACH: Progress report 2012. ECHA-13-A-01-EN. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/17221/evaluation_report_2012_en.pdf/fa360388-4c23-4816-90be-09812061e12f

ECHA (2014). Evaluation under REACH: Progress report 2013. ECHA-14-A-01-EN. doi:10.2823/22707

ECHA (2015). Survey results – Analysis of higher tier studies submitted without testing proposals. ECHA-15-R-13-EN. doi:10.2823/11412

ECHA (2016). Report on the Operation of REACH and CLP 2016, ECHA-16-R-08-EN

ECHA (2017a). Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment – Chapter R.7a: Endpoint specific guidance. ECHA-17-G-18-EN. doi:10.2823/337352

ECHA (2017b). Evaluation under REACH: Progress report 2016. ECHA-17-R-03-EN. doi:10.2823/588707

ECHA (2017c). The use of alternatives to testing on animals for the REACH regulation. Third report under Article 117(3) of the REACH Regulation. June 2017. ECHA-17-R-02-EN. doi:10.2823/023078

ECHA (2017d). Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF). ECHA-17-R-01-EN. doi:10.2823/619212

ECHA (2018). Evaluation under REACH: Progress report 2017. ECHA-18-R-05-EN. doi:10.2823/76886

ECHA (2020). The use of alternatives to testing on animals for the REACH regulation. Fourth report under Article 117(3) of the REACH Regulation. June 2020. ECHA-20-R-08-EN. doi:10.2823/092305

ECHA (2021). Report on the Operation of REACH and CLP 2021. ECHA-21-R-06-EN. doi:10.2823/041059

ECHA (2023). The use of alternatives to testing on animals for the REACH Regulation. Fifth report under Article 117(3) of the REACH Regulation. June 2023. ECHA-23-R-07-EN. doi:10.2823/805454

Hofer, T., Gerner, I., Gundert-Remy, U. et al. (2004). Animal testing and alternative approaches for the human health risk assessment under the proposed new European chemicals regulation. Arch Toxicol 78, 549-564. doi:10.1007/s00204-004-0577-9

OECD (2018a). Test No. 408: Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. OECD Publishing, Paris. doi:10.1787/9789264070707-en

OECD (2018b). Test No. 412: Subacute Inhalation Toxicity: 28-Day Study. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. OECD Publishing, Paris. doi:10.1787/9789264070783-en

Pedersen, F., de Bruijn, J., Munn, S. et al. (2003). Assessment of additional testing needs under REACH – Effects of (Q)SARs, risk based testing and voluntary industry initiatives. Joint Research Centre Report EUR 20863.

Rovida, C. and Hartung, T. (2009). Re-evaluation of animal numbers and costs for in vivo tests to accomplish REACH legislation requirements for chemicals – A report by the Transatlantic Think Tank for Toxicology (t4). ALTEX 26, 187-208. doi:10.14573/altex.2009.3.187

Rovida, C., Barton-Maclaren, T., Benfenati, E. et al. (2020). Internationalisation of read-across as a validated new approach method (NAM) for regulatory toxicology. ALTEX 37, 579-606. doi:10.14573/altex.1912181

Taylor, K., Stengel, W., Casalegno, C. et al. (2014). Experiences of the REACH testing proposals system to reduce animal testing. ALTEX 31, 107-128. doi:10.14573/altex.1311151

Taylor, K. (2018). Ten years of REACH – An animal protection perspective. Altern Lab Anim 46, 347-373. doi:10.1177/026119291804600610

van der Jagt, K., Munn, S., Tørsløv, J. et al., J. (2004). Alternative approaches can reduce the use of test animals under REACH. JRC Report EUR 21405 EN

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 > >>