Development of a monoclonal antibody sandwich ELISA for the determination of antigen content and quality in diphtheria vaccines
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
At present, quality control of diphtheria vaccines by both manufacturers and national control laboratories relies heavily on in vivo assays to confirm potency. As part of the VAC2VAC project we have developed a monoclonal antibody (mAb) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to measure the relative amount and quality of diphtheria toxoid (DTxd) in diphtheria-tetanus based vaccines and believe this test has the potential to play a key role in a control strategy no longer including an in vivo potency test. The mAb ELISA is highly specific, has good dilutional linearity, and is suitable for detecting DTxd in a range of different human vaccine products. We demonstrate the ability of the assay to discriminate between batches of different content and quality using vaccine batches that were prepared to contain differing amounts of DTxd or were altered by exposure to heat or oxidative stress. We also demonstrate successful transfer of the method to other laboratories and show that different diphtheria antigen materials may be able to serve as a reference antigen for local standardization of the method. The assay is ideally suited for incorporation into a consistency approach for routine diphtheria vaccine quality control testing and may be suitable to serve as the stability indicating test in replacement of the current in vivo potency test.
Plain language summary
Diphtheria vaccines help to protect against diphtheria infection. Currently, animal tests are used to ensure the potency of such vaccines. Since these tests were first introduced, there have been improvements in non-animal technologies that can be used to ensure consistent production of potent vaccine batches. To demonstrate that a new batch of diphtheria vaccine is consistent with a previous batch of known potency, the quality and amount of the component that stimulates the immune response upon vaccination must be assessed in comparison. We have developed an assay that can measure the quality of a range of different diphtheria vaccine product types. The assay is very specific and reliable, and different laboratories obtained comparable results, showing that the assay is suited for routine use. Once validated by manufacturers and recognized by regulators, this assay will greatly reduce the number of animals needed for batch release of diphtheria vaccines.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is appropriately cited (CC-BY). Copyright on any article in ALTEX is retained by the author(s).
Akkermans, A., Chapsal, J. M., Coccia, E. M. et al. (2020). Animal testing for vaccines. Implementing replacement, reduction and refinement: Challenges and priorities. Biologicals 68, 92-107. doi:10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.07.010
Clarke, K., MacNeil, A., Hadler, S. et al. (2019). Global epidemiology of diphtheria, 2000-2017. Emerg Infect Dis 25, 1834-1842. doi:10.3201/eid2510.190271
Coombes, L., Stickings, P., Tierney, R. et al. (2009). Development and use of a novel in vitro assay for testing of diphtheria toxoid in combination vaccines. J Immunol Methods 350, 142-149. doi:10.1016/j.jim.2009.09.002
Council of Europe (2008). Assay of diphtheria vaccine (adsorbed). Chapter 2.7.6. In European Pharmacopoeia. Strasbourg.
Council of Europe (2018). Substitution of in vivo method(s) by in vitro method(s) for the quality control of vaccines. Chapter 5.2.14. In European Pharmacopoeia. Strasbourg.
De Mattia, F., Chapsal, J-M., Descamps, J. et al. (2011). The consistency approach for quality control of vaccines – A strategy to improve quality control and implement 3Rs. Biologicals 39, 59-65. doi:10.1016/j.biologicals.2010.12.001
Gupta, R. K., Anderson, R., Cecchini, D. et al. (1996). Development of a guinea-pig model for potency/immunogenicity evaluation of diphtheria, tetanus acellular pertussis (DTaP) and Haemophilus influenzae type b polysaccharide conjugate vaccines. Dev Biol Stand 86, 283-296.
McFarland, R., Verthelyi, D., Casey, W. et al. (2011). Non-animal replacement methods for human vaccine potency testing: State of the science and future directions. Procedia Vaccinol 5, 16-32. doi:10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.002
Rappuoli, R. (1997). New and improved vaccines against diphtheria and tetanus. In Myron M. Levine, Graeme C. Woodrow et al. (eds), New Generation Vaccines (417-436). 2nd edition. New York, USA: Marcel Dekker.
Riches-Duit, R., Hassall, L., Kogelman, A. et al. (2021). Characterisation of diphtheria monoclonal antibodies as a first step towards the development of an in vitro vaccine potency immunoassay. Biologicals 69, 38-48. doi:10.1016/j.biologicals.2020.12.002
Schutte, K., Szczepanska, A., Halder, M. et al. (2017). Modern science for better quality control of medicinal products “Towards global harmonization of 3Rs in biologicals”: The report of an EPAA workshop. Biologicals 48, 55-65. doi:10.1016/j.biologicals.2017.05.006
Sesardic, D., Winsnes, R., Rigsby, P. et al. (2004). Collaborative study for the validation of serological methods for potency testing of diphtheria toxoid vaccines – Extended study: Correlation of serology with in vivo toxin neutralisation. Pharmeuropa Bio 2003, 69-76.
Sharma, N. C., Efstratiou, A., Mokrousov, I. et al. (2019). Diphtheria. Nat Rev Dis Primers 5, 81. doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0131-y
Stalpers, C. A. L., Retmana, I. A., Pennings, J. L. A et al. (2021). Variability of in vivo potency tests of diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccines. Vaccine 39, 2506-2516. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.078
Stickings, P., Rigsby, P., Coombes, L. et al. (2010). Collaborative study for the calibration of a replacement international standard for diphtheria toxoid adsorbed. Biologicals 38, 529-538. doi:10.1016/j.biologicals.2010.04.001
Stickings, P., Rigsby, P., Coombes, L. et al. (2011). Animal refinement and reduction: Alternative approaches for potency testing of diphtheria and tetanus vaccines. Procedia Vaccinol 5, 200-212. doi:10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.020
van den Biggelaar, R., Hoefnagel, M., Vandebriel, R. et al. (2021). Overcoming scientific barriers in the transition from in vivo to non-animal batch testing of human and veterinary vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines 20, 1221-1233. doi:10.1080/14760584.2021.1977628
Vermeulen, M., Feck, I. Francotte, A. et al. (2023). Development of a multiplex-based immunoassay for the characterization of diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis antigens in human combined DTaP vaccines. J Immunol Methods 517, 113483. doi:10.1016/j.jim.2023.113483
WHO – World Health Organization (1990). Annex 2 Requirements for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and combined vaccines. In WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization: Fortieth Report (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 800). Geneva. https://bit.ly/46KuUCM
WHO (2005). Annex 5 Recommendations for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis and combined vaccines (Amendments 2003). In: WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization: Fifty-fourth Report (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 927). Geneva. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43094/WHO_TRS_927_eng.pdf?sequence=1
Winsnes, R., Sesardic, D., Daas, A. et al. (2002). A Vero cell method for potency testing of diphtheria vaccines. Dev Biol (Basel) 111, 141-148.
Winsnes, R., Sesardic, D., Daas, A. et al. (2004). Collaborative study for the validation of serological methods for potency testing of diphtheria toxoid vaccines – Part 1. Pharmeuropa Bio 2003, 35-68.
Winsnes, R., Sesardic, D., Daas, A. et al. (2006). Collaborative study for the validation of serological methods for potency testing of diphtheria toxoid vaccines (Part 2). Pharmeuropa Bio 2006, 73-88.