Developing a global education hub for animal-free innovation
Main Article Content
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is appropriately cited (CC-BY). Copyright on any article in ALTEX is retained by the author(s).
Andreoli, L., Vlasblom, R., Drost, R. et al. (2023). Challenging future generations: A qualitative study of students’ attitudes toward the transition to animal-free innovations in education and research. Animals 13, 394. doi:10.3390/ani13030394
Baumgartl-Simons, C. and Hohensee, C. (2019). How can the final goal of completely replacing animal procedures successfully be achieved? In Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change (pp. 88-123). Brill.
Daneshian, M., Akbarsha, M. A., Blaauboer, B. et al. (2011). A framework program for the teaching of alternative methods (replacement, reduction, refinement) to animal experimentation. ALTEX 28, 341-352. doi:10.14573/altex.2011.4.341
Harrison, C. (2024). 3R centers tap into the human mindset to bolster replacement, reduction and refinement uptake. Lab Anim 53, 166-169. doi:10.1038/s41684-024-01396-1
Hartung, T., Blaauboer, B., & Leist, M. (2009). Food for thought ... on education in alternative methods in toxicology. ALTEX 26, 255-263. doi:10.14573/altex.2009.4.255
Herrmann, K. (2019). Refinement on the Way Towards Replacement: Are We Doing What We Can?. In Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change. Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004391192_002
EC - European Commission: Joint Research Centre, Åhs, E., Barroso, J. et al. (2022). Non-animal methods in science and regulation : EURL ECVAM status report 2021, Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/93290
Leenaars, C. H. C., Kouwenaar, C., Stafleu, F. R. et al. (2019). Animal to human translation: a systematic scoping review of reported concordance rates. J Transl Med 17, 223. doi:10.1186/s12967-019-1976-2
Moruzzi, A., Shroff, T., Keller, S. et al. (2023). Training the next generation of researchers in the organ-on-chip field. Education Sciences 13, 144. doi:10.3390/educsci13020144
Ormandy, E., Schwab, J. C., Suiter, S. et al. (2022). Animal dissection vs. non-animal teaching methods: A systematic review of pedagogical value. American Biology Teacher 84, 399-404. doi:10.1525/abt.2022.84.7.399
Singh, D., Mathur, A., Arora, S. et al. (2022). Journey of organ on a chip technology and its role in future healthcare scenario. Applied Surface Science Advances 9, 100246. doi:10.1016/j.apsadv.2022.100246
Zemanova, M. A. and Knight, A. (2021). The educational efficacy of humane teaching methods: A systematic review of the evidence. Animals 11, 114. doi:10.3390/ani11010114
Zemanova, M. A., Knight, A. and Lybæk, S. (2021). Educational use of animals in Europe indicates reluctance to implement alternatives. ALTEX 38, 490-506. doi:10.14573/altex.2011111