Hepatotoxicity prediction by systems biology modeling of disturbed metabolic pathways using gene expression data

Main Article Content

Pablo Carbonell , Oriol Lopez, Alexander Amberg, Manuel Pastor, Ferran Sanz
[show affiliations]

Abstract

The present study applies a systems biology approach for the in silico predictive modeling of drug toxicity on the basis of high-quality preclinical drug toxicity data with the aim of increasing the mechanistic understanding of toxic effects of compounds at different levels (pathway, cell, tissue, organ). The model development was carried out using 77 compounds for which gene expression data for treated primary human hepatocytes is available in the LINCS database and for which rodent in vivo hepatotoxicity information is available in the eTOX database. The data from LINCS were used to determine the type and number of pathways disturbed by each compound and to estimate the extent of disturbance (network perturbation elasticity), and were used to analyze the correspondence with the in vivo information from eTOX. Predictive models were developed through this integrative analysis, and their specificity and sensitivity were assessed. The quality of the predictions was determined on the basis of the area under the curve (AUC) of plots of true positive vs. false positive rates (ROC curves). The ROC AUC reached values of up to 0.9 (out of 1.0) for some hepatotoxicity endpoints. Moreover, the most frequently disturbed metabolic pathways were determined across the studied toxicants. They included, e.g., mitochondrial beta-oxidation of fatty acids and amino acid metabolism. The process was exemplified by successful predictions on various statins. In conclusion, an entirely new approach linking gene expression alterations to the prediction of complex organ toxicity was developed and evaluated.

Article Details

How to Cite
Carbonell, P. (2017) “Hepatotoxicity prediction by systems biology modeling of disturbed metabolic pathways using gene expression data”, ALTEX - Alternatives to animal experimentation, 34(2), pp. 219–234. doi: 10.14573/altex.1602071.
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)