Animal research ethics as interaction of research ethics, animal ethics, and (animal protection) law

Main Article Content

Felicitas Selter, Tatiana Hetzel, Hannes Kahrass, Marcel Mertz
[show affiliations]

Article Details

How to Cite
Selter, F. (2023) “Animal research ethics as interaction of research ethics, animal ethics, and (animal protection) law”, ALTEX - Alternatives to animal experimentation, 40(3), pp. 541–544. doi: 10.14573/altex.2301171.
Meeting Reports

Agam-Segal, R. (2014). When language gives out: Conceptualization, and aspect-seeing as a form of judgment. Metaphilosophy 45, 41-68. doi:10.1111/meta.12068

Buchheister, S. and Bleich, A. (2021). Health monitoring of laboratory rodent colonies – Talking about (r)evolution. Animals 11, 5. doi:10.3390/ani11051410

Camenzind, S. (submitted). The 3D method: A tool to analyze positions in animal and environmental ethics.

Cochrane, A. (2007). Animal rights and animal experiments: An interest-based approach. Res Publica 13, 293-318.

Franco, N. H., Sandøe, P. and Olsson, I. A. S. (2018). Researchers’ attitudes to the 3Rs – An upturned hierarchy? PLoS One 13, e0200895. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200895

Fuller, L. L. (1965). The Morality of Law (revised edition). Yale Univ. Press.

Healey, R. and Pepper, A. (2021). Interspecies justice: Agency, self-determination, and assent. Philosophical Studies 178, 1223-1243. doi:10.1007/s11098-020-01472-5

Herrmann, K. and Flecknell, P. (2019). Retrospective review of anesthetic and analgesic regimens used in animal research proposals. ALTEX 36, 65-80. doi:10.14573/altex.1804011

Jörgensen, S., Lindsjö, J., Weber, E. M. et al. (2021). Reviewing the review: A pilot study of the ethical review process of animal research in Sweden. Animals 11, 708. doi:10.3390/ani11030708

Leenaars, C. H. C., Kouwenaar, C., Stafleu, F. R. et al. (2019). Animal to human translation: A systematic scoping review of reported concordance rates. J Transl Med 17, 223. doi:10.1186/s12967-019-1976-2

Linder, E. and Grimm, H. (2022). Aspect-seeing in animal research: The absence of justice in the harm-benefit analysis. In D. Bruce and A. Bruce (eds.), Transforming Food Systems: Ethics, Innovation and Responsibility, (240-244). Wageningen Academic Publishers. doi:10.3920/978-90-8686-939-8_36

Lund, T. B., Lassen, J. and Sandøe, P. (2012). Public attitude formation regarding animal research. Anthrozoos 25, 475-490.

Lund, T. B., Mørkbak, M. R., Lassen, J. et al. (2014). Painful dilemmas – A study of the way the public’s assessment of animal research balances costs to animals against human benefits. Public Underst Sci 23, 428-444. doi:10.1177/0963662512451402

Martin, A. (2022). Animal research that respects animal rights: Extending requirements for research with humans to animals. Cambridge Q Healthc Ethics 31, 59-72. doi:10.1017/S0963180121000499

Nøhr, R., Lund, T. B. and Lassen, J. (2016). The Danish 3R survey: Knowledge, attitudes and experiences with the 3Rs among researchers involved in animal experiments in Denmark. Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen. IFRO Report No. 249.

Pippin, J. J., Cavanaugh, S. E. and Pistollato, F. (2019). Animal research for Alzheimer disease: Failures of science and ethics. In K. Herrmann and K. Jayne (eds), Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change (480-516). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004391192_021

Tjärnström, E., Weber, E., Hultgren, J. et al. (2018). Emotions and ethical decision‐making in animal ethics committees. Animals 8, 181. doi:10.3390/ani8100181

von Roten, F. C. (2013). Public perceptions of animal experimentation across Europe. Public Underst Sci 22, 691-703.

Wieschowski, S., Biernot, S., Deutsch, S. et al. (2019). Publication rates in animal research. Extent and characteristics of published and non-published animal studies followed up at two German university medical centres. PLoS One 14, e0223758. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0223758

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). The Philosophical Investigations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.