Toxicity testing in the 21st century beyond environmental chemicals

Main Article Content

Costanza Rovida
Shoji Asakura
Mardas Daneshian
Hana Hofman-Huether
Marcel Leist
Leo Meunier
David Reif
Anna Rossi
Markus Schmutz
Jean-Pierre Valentin
Joanne Zurlo
Thomas Hartung

Abstract

After the publication of the report titled Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century – A Vision and a Strategy, many initiatives started to foster a major paradigm shift for toxicity testing – from apical endpoints in animal-based tests to mechanistic endpoints through delineation of pathways of toxicity (PoT) in human cell based systems. The US EPA has funded an important project to develop new high throughput technologies based on human cell based in vitro technologies. These methods are currently being incorporated into the chemical risk assessment process. In the pharmaceutical industry, the efficacy and toxicity of new drugs are evaluated during preclinical investigations that include drug metabolism, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety toxicology studies. The results of these studies are analyzed and extrapolated to predict efficacy and potential adverse effects in humans. However, due to the high failure rate of drugs during the clinical phases, a new approach for a more predictive assessment of drugs both in terms of efficacy and adverse effects is getting urgent. The food industry faces the challenge of assessing novel foods and food ingredients for the general population, while using animal safety testing for extrapolation purposes is often of limited relevance. The question is whether the latest paradigm shift proposed by the Tox21c report for chemicals may provide a useful tool to improve the risk assessment approach also for drugs and food ingredients.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rovida, C., Asakura, S., Daneshian, M., Hofman-Huether, H., Leist, M., Meunier, L., Reif, D., Rossi, A., Schmutz, M., Valentin, J.-P., Zurlo, J. and Hartung, T. (2015) “Toxicity testing in the 21st century beyond environmental chemicals”, ALTEX - Alternatives to animal experimentation, 32(3), pp. 171-181. doi: 10.14573/altex.1506201.
Section
Food for Thought ...

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>