In vitro metabolism and bioavailability tests for endocrine active substances: What is needed next for regulatory purposes?

Main Article Content

Miriam N. Jacobs , Susan C. Laws, Kate Willett, Pat Schmieder, Jenny Odum
[show affiliations]

Abstract

Legislation and prospective legislative proposals internationally (may) require that chemicals be tested for their ability to disrupt the hormonal systems of mammals. Chemicals found to test positive in vitro are considered to be endocrine active substances (EAS) and may be putative endocrine disruptors (EDs) in vivo. While there is a growing body of international in vitro test guidelines addressing EAS mechanisms and modes of action, to date there are still few or no standardized methods to incorporate metabolic and toxicokinetic aspects into these in vitro tests for EAS. In vitro assays for EAS should incorporate metabolic enzyme systems to better address the relevance of EAS tests to in vivo adverse outcome pathways, and a previous OECD review paper indicated how this could be done. This paper revisits those recommendations, addressing where research and funding efforts are needed to expedite the development of suitable in vitro metabolism systems to improve the accuracy of in vitro assays for identifying EAS and EDs. Recommendations are made for projects to support short, medium, and long-term goals. The complexity of in vivo metabolism presents major challenges for the development of predictive models suitable for the extrapolation of data from in silico/in vitro approaches to models that can occur in vivo. Therefore, the long-term recommendations are intended to foster an international harmonization of databases, delineation of metabolic pathways, and development of predictive tools that will provide a fundamental understanding of the processes by which metabolism occurs, increasing the predictive accuracy of in silico/in vitro methods.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jacobs, M. N. (2013) “In vitro metabolism and bioavailability tests for endocrine active substances: What is needed next for regulatory purposes?”, ALTEX - Alternatives to animal experimentation, 30(3), pp. 331–351. doi: 10.14573/altex.2013.3.331.
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)