Editorial

Dear readers,


Starting off into 2019, a good New Year’s resolution for scientists in our field could be to take a step back and invest some time into looking at how we design, analyze, and report our experiments and to question whether we are up to date with the most recent guide­lines that have been developed to aid us to make the most of our work and ensure that others can reproduce and build on the results. To start you off in this direction, Thomas Hartung and colleagues give an overview of activities and guidelines to improve reporting standards and introduce a CAAT-led initiative focused on such stan­dards specifically for in vitro studies in this issue’s Food for thought … As a practical start, Jaffar Kisitu et al. discuss concepts and prob­lems around the use of concentrations, doses, their units, and how they are displayed in BenchMarks.


Related issues are discussed in two papers on the zebrafish em­bryotoxicity test. When a new method is established and multiple laboratories start to use it, inconsistent results between laboratories may be the result of variations made to adapt or improve the proto­col. Jon Hamm et al. interviewed different laboratories performing the zebrafish embryotoxicity assay, which is an alternative to the acute fish toxicity test, to identify and differentiate between varia­tions that are likely to have limited versus major influence on the results. This information will lead to guidance that can improve the consistency of results between laboratories. In line with this, Ani­ta Birke and Stefan Scholz have retested six narcotic compounds, reported to be incorrectly classified in the zebrafish embryotoxicity assay. When tested in accordance with the OECD TG 236, which requires the measurement of actual exposure concentrations, the substances were classified correctly.


In another research article that uses vertebrate embryos before the last third of gestation (when pain reception becomes possible), Eva Petrovova and colleagues report on the use of the chorioallantoic membrane of the chick and quail embryo to follow the growth of the avian blood vessels into a bioengineered scaffold developed to repair bone defects. A scaffold that is amenable to vascularization allows a better supply of nutrients to bone cell precursors and will thus likely better support bone regeneration.


The synovial membrane lines the capsule of joints and shows pathological changes both in rheumatoid as well as osteoarthritis. Mathijs Broeren et al. have developed and characterized a 3-dimen­sional in vitro model of this membrane containing fibroblast-like and macrophage-like cells, which can be nudged towards either dis­ease state by exposure to TNFα or TGFβ, i.e., cytokines that are linked to the respective diseases. This human cell-based model may be used to test drugs designed to treat or modulate either disease.


Predicting systemic toxicity of a chemical by non-animal methods is highly challenging because so many different organ systems throughout the body can be affected. Pilar Prieto et al. have com­piled the toxicity mechanisms of 114 chemicals for which both in vivo and in vitro toxicity data are available. This information can form the basis for the development of adverse outcome pathways and integrated approaches to testing and assessment. But can an adverse outcome pathway, i.e., the chain of events leading from chemical exposure to an adverse health event, be used to predict chemical hazard not only qualitatively but quantitatively? Edward Perkins and colleagues have developed three successful approach­es to test this using in vitro data and discuss how they can be used in a regulatory context for decision making.


Bacterial sepsis is a highly lethal disease. Many drug candidates that were promising in mouse and rat models failed in humans. Wen Chung et al. have developed a model in which pig spleens from the abattoir are perfused with pig blood to study the invasion and colonization of the organ by bacteria. They can monitor how pneumococci added to the blood are collected by the spleen and grow into clusters after phagocytosis by resident macrophages. Owing to both the architecture of the spleen and the immune sys­tem of pigs and humans being more similar, the information gained from the pig organs may translate better to the human patient than data from rodent studies.


Anesthesia and pain management are key elements of the treat­ment of patients undergoing surgery. But what role does this play when experimental animals are subjected to surgery? Kathrin Herrmann and Paul Flecknell evaluated over 500 German animal research proposals submitted during one year to determine how pain is assessed and managed in mice and rats before, during, and after surgery, and whether adequate anesthesia is regularly provided.


When Allergan announced in 2011 that they had developed an approved cell-based assay to test batches of botulinum toxin that could replace almost all such testing on animals, it was thought that other companies would soon follow suit and numbers of ani­mals used for this purpose would drop dramatically. Katy Taylor et al. find that this is still not the case. They trace the develop­ments in this field and discuss them from the perspective of an an­imal protection organization.


China’s strategy and challenges around adopting alternative methods for cosmetics testing is explained in a letter by Fei-ya Luo and colleagues, and meeting reports and corners provide a synop­sis of recent activities. Please consult our website for current news from the field of alternative methods and to plan your participa­tion in 3Rs related events in 2019.


Wishing you continued success in your scientific endeavors.


Sonja von Aulock


Editor in chief, ALTEX

[read more]
Food for Thought ...

Toward Good In Vitro Reporting Standards

Vol. 36 No. 1 (2019), pp. 3-17
https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1812191
Abstract
Articles

A three-dimensional model to study human synovial pathology

Vol. 36 No. 1 (2019), pp. 18-28
https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1804161
Abstract

An ex vivo porcine spleen perfusion as a model of bacterial sepsis

Vol. 36 No. 1 (2019), pp. 29-38
https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1805131
Abstract

Investigating cell type specific mechanisms contributing to acute oral toxicity

Vol. 36 No. 1 (2019), pp. 39-64
https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1805181
Abstract

Retrospective review of anesthetic and analgesic regimens used in animal research proposals

Vol. 36 No. 1 (2019), pp. 65-80
https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1804011
Abstract

Botulinum toxin testing on animals is still a Europe-wide issue

Vol. 36 No. 1 (2019), pp. 81-90
https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1807101
Abstract

Chemical hazard prediction and hypothesis testing using quantitative adverse outcome pathways

Vol. 36 No. 1 (2019), pp. 91-102
https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1808241
Abstract

Characterizing sources of variability in zebrafish embryo screening protocols

Vol. 36 No. 1 (2019), pp. 103-120
https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1804162
Abstract

Preclinical alternative model for analysis of porous scaffold biocompatibility in bone tissue engineering

Vol. 36 No. 1 (2019), pp. 121-130
https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1807241
Abstract
Short communications

Zebrafish embryo and acute fish toxicity test show similar sensitivity for narcotic compounds

Vol. 36 No. 1 (2019), pp. 131-135
https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1808101
Abstract
Corners
empty image

Corners

Vol. 36 No. 1 (2019), pp. 148-153
BenchMarks

Chemical concentrations in cell culture compartments (C5) – concentration definitions

Vol. 36 No. 1 (2019), pp. 154-160
https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1901031
Abstract
Editorial Material